Legal Opinion

Stilp v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 2006No. 1 M.D. 2006PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this original jurisdiction matter, a resident taxpayer challenges on constitutional grounds the availability to state legislators of anything of benefit beyond “salary and mileage.” Also, constitutional challenges are raised to local grant monies, *780referred to as “walking around money” or “WAMs,” and to leadership accounts. In addition to the General Assembly and the named legislative leaders of both parties, the Governor and the Treasurer are named as Respondents.1

Currently before the Court are Respondents’ preliminary objections to the Amended Petition for Review…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. D.Z. v. Bethlehem Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Stilp v. COM., GENERAL ASSEMBLYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. Tom Wolf, Governor of the Comwlth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Mobley v. ColemanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API