Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Hogan Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1929No. 29,095PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action arose under the workmen's compensation law. James E. Taylor had been an employee of the Hogan Milling Company for a period of about eleven years. During his employment and on August 1, 1928, Taylor, while at work in the mill, applied for and was given permission by the foreman to go from the first to the fourth floor of the mill to pay a fellow employee a bill which he said he owed to him. In going there he used a man-lift, which was an endless belt revolving on pulleys, one at the top and another at the bottom, which had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. White v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Haas v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Corpora v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Conklin v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Hilyard v. Lohmann-Johnson Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Kearns v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Parrish v. . Armour Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API