Legal Opinion
Holland v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 29, 1996No. 94-1046PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
The appellant, veteran Sterling R. Holland, on November 16, 1994, filed a Notice of Appeal (NOA) fi'om an August 25, 1994, deci*325sion of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) granting an increased rating from 10% to 20% for residuals of a service-connected left-ankle fracture [hereinafter ankle residuals] and not addressing the veteran’s claim for a disability rating greater than 10% and an earlier effective date for a service-connected back condition. In his NOA, the appellant stated that “Nashville changed [his] original disagreement letter”, that he has been…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Fletcher v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Fee Agreement of CoxUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Smith v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Phillips v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Holland v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Garlejo v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.