Legal Opinion

State v. Dykes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 2007No. ED 89881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARY K. HOFF, Presiding Judge.

The State of Missouri files this interlocutory appeal, pursuant to Section 547.200.8, RSMo 2000, 1 resulting from the trial court’s order suppressing statements that Harold Dykes (Defendant) made to police following his arrest for felony stealing. The State argues the trial court erred in suppressing Defendant’s incriminating statements regarding an unrelated case because (1) the Assistant Circuit Attorney, who was a witness to the incriminating statements, and her mere presence at the suppression hearing, did not render the statements inadmissible, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LanningMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API