Legal Opinion

Connor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1914No. 2240PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana; George M. Bourqüin, Judge. Suits in equity by the United States against William Connor and against Ida Connor (consolidated). Decrees for the United States, and defendants appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana; George M. Bourqüin, Judge. Suits in equity by the United States against William Connor and against Ida Connor (consolidated). Decrees for the United States, and defendants appeal. On the 30th day of June, 1899, the appellant Ida Connor, proceeding under and by virtue of the provisions of the act of Congress of March 3, 1877, entitled “An act to provide for the sale of desert lands in certain states and territories,” as amended by the act of Congress approved March 3, 1891, filed in the land office of the United…

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). [1] 1. A preliminary question arises in these suits with respect to certain assignments of error of the appellants wherein it is alleged that it was error on the part of the trial court to refuse to approve the report of the master in chancery, and to order the bills dismissed as the *526master recommended, and, further, that the decrees were erroneous, in that, the causes having been tried before the master under a consent agreement, whereby the master was to,try all of the issues and report the same to the court, the District Court had no jurisdiction in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adalex Const. Co. v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Holt Mfg. Co. v. C. L. Best Gas Traction Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1917
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Goldsmith Silver Co. v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915
  5. Kendall v. BunnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API