Legal Opinion

Adalex Const. Co. v. Atkins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 19, 1925No. 6 Div. 342PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This suit involves the claim of a contractor for balance due for labor and materials furnished in the erection of a residence under written contract with the owner, and the enforcement of a mechanic’s lien therefor. The issues presented go to the question of indebtedness vel non. The register, on a reference, found for the contractor for the amount claimed. The trial court sustained exceptions to the report, and rendered a decree in favor of the owner.

The contract was as follows:

“This agreement made this 10th day of November, 1921, by and between Adalex Construction Company, hereinafter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Faulk & Co. v. Hobbie Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Andrews v. FriersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  5. Bidwell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Bay Minette Land Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Mutual Service Funeral Homes v. FehlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Fowler v. Fayco, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Watt v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API