Kendall v. Bunnell
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
On June 1, 1915, a patent was issued to defendant for the land in controversy—a parcel containing almost 160 acres. According to the plat of the resurvey of certain lands in the Imperial Valley filed in the Los Angeles land office February 23, 1909, the land in controversy is the SB.. 14 of the NW. 14 and the NB 14 of the SW. % and lots 8 and 12 of section 7, township 16 south, range 16 east, San Bernardino base and meridian. Claiming that the patent was mistakenly issued to defendant by reason of certain alleged erroneous legal conclusions on the part of the land department, plaintiff…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Lee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Burfenning v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Thurston County, Neb.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Walls v. EvansWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Wyodak Chemical Co. v. Board of Land CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Kendall v. BunnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925