Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Mills
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1922No. Civ. No. 2425PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was for damages for the removal of a certain building from the lands of plaintiff situ ated in the town of Coalinga, in the county of Fresno, and defendant had judgment for his costs, from which judgment the appeal has been taken.
Of the undisputed facts we may recite the following: On May 31, 1905, plaintiff and one M. S. Gibson were the equal owners of lots 17 and 18, block 29, of said town, said Gibson being in the sole possession and control of said lots, occupying a part of the same with a building, in which he was conducting a saloon, the rear end of the lots being vacant, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watriss v. First National Bank of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Robinson v. RispinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Tench v. McMeekanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Carr v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Earle v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Branch v. WaffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Street v. Smith Bros. Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Branch v. WaffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Street v. Smith Bros. Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925