Legal Opinion

Meryhew v. Gillingham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 28, 1995No. 34360-2-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.

The Estate of Edith Liebel appeals the dismissal of its claims against attorney Paul G. Gillingham for mishandling the probate of Ms. Liebel’s mother’s estate (the Sommers estate), violation of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), disgorgement, and legal malpractice. The trial court dismissed all of these claims, finding them barred by the probate statute of limitation. We affirm in part and reverse in part. All claims regarding Gillingham’s probate of the estate are time barred, but the claim for legal malpractice against Gillingham as attorney for Liebel is not controlled by the probate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Short v. DemopolisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Trask v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Allard v. Pacific National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ethridge v. HwangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Ethridge v. HwangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Simburg, Better, Sheppard & Purdy, L.L.P. v. OlshanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Simburg, Ketter, Sheppard & Purdy, L.L.P. v. OlshanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. Colleen M. Edwards v. Patrick MulvihillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API