Legal Opinion

Burg Ex Rel. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 11, 2001No. 00-3258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.

¶ 1. Karl A. Burg, by his legal guardian, Gladys M. Weichert, appeals from the judgment, following a jury trial, dismissing his action against Robert W. Zimmerman and Zimmerman's insurer, Cincinnati Casualty Insurance Co.1 Burg argues that the trial court erred in concluding that Zimmerman's conduct in the operation of a snowmobile was not negligent per se, and that the jury's damages verdict was perverse. Burg is correct and, therefore, we reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2. The facts relevant to resolution of the issues on appeal are not in dispute. According to the trial testimony, at approximately…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. County of Milwaukee v. ProeglerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  5. Mainz v. LundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burg Ex Rel. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Commitment of ClementCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  3. Burg Ex Rel. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Burg Ex Rel. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Burg Ex Rel. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API