Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burg Ex Rel. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2002No. 00-3258Published

1DissentN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 30. (dissenting). I cannot join the majority's opinion because I conclude that the driver of the snowmobile was indeed "operating" the snowmobile as defined in Wis. Stat. § 350.01.1 would affirm the court of appeals' decision that stopping a snowmobile and turning off its motor is "operation," because such actions require the exercise of physical control over the speed and direction of the snowmobile. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

*50¶ 31. The majority concludes that the term "operate" in Wis. Stat. § 350.09 does not include the actions of a driver sitting on a parked snowmobile after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Milwaukee v. ProeglerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. State v. ModoryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. Burg Ex Rel. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API