Legal Opinion

Hine v. Wadlington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1910No. 1146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Corporation Commission. Petition by B. C. Wadlington and others before the Corporation Commission to establish telephone rates of the Purcell & Lexington Telephone Company, owned by Lewis T. Hine. From an order establishing the rates, respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

On the 17th day of October, A. D. 1908, on petition of B. C. Wadlington, an order was entered by the Corporation Commission fixing and establishing the rates of charges for messages and rentals for phones per month in the city of Purcell, Okla., and on appeal from such order to this court the following questions are raised: (1) The Purcell & Lexington Telephone Company, being owned solely by Lewis T. Hiñe, an indi vidual, had the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma jurisdiction? (2) . Does the evidence, in connection with the prima facie presumption in its favor, justify the order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Midland Valley R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WestenhaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russell v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Hine v. WadlingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API