Legal Opinion
Hine v. Wadlington
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 14, 1912No. 1144PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Corporation Commission. Proceedings before the Corporation Commission by B. C. Wadlington and others against Lewis T. Hine, sole owner of the Purcell-Lexington Telephone Company. From the order of the Commission, Hine appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
On the 27th day of October, A. D. 1908, on petition of B. C. Wadlington and others, an order was entered by the Corporation Commission fixing and establishing rates of charges for messages and rentals of phones per month in the city of Purcell.
On October 16, 1909, petition in error, with record attached, was filed in this court to review said order; said petition in error being in part as follows:
“Comes now Lewis T. Hine, plaintiff in error, and alleges and shows to the court that on the 17th day" of October, A. D. 1908, said defendant in error, B. C. Wadlington, obtained an order and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffin v. Goldsboro Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- City of Danville v. Danville Water Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Armour Packing Co. v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- State ex rel. Ferguson v. Birmingham W. Works Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Intrastate Express RatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- In Re Intrastate Express RatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913