Legal Opinion

Seaman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Holliston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 1960PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

The zoning board of appeals of Hollis-ton in March, 1959, denied the plaintiff’s application for a permit to erect at his residence in a residential B district a sign to indicate that he is a “realtor,” that is, “a real estate broker who is an active member of a local board having membership in the national association of real estate boards.”

The zoning by-law authorizes in a B district the “use of a room or rooms in a dwelling or accessory building for a customary home occupation or practice of a profession, provided there is no external evidence of any business other than permitted signs; .…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. Village of Riverside v. KuhneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. Building Commissioner v. McManusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Jones v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. ColangeloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Williams v. Inspector of Buildings of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Tylle v. ZouchaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hackett v. GaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API