Legal Opinion
Hackett v. Gale
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 22, 1962No. 5013PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
The pivotal issue in this case is the interpretation of Article III, s. 1 of the zoning ordinance of the town of Hampton. Its pertinent language is the following: “In Residence ... A districts no building or land shall be used for any purpose except one or more of the following. 1. Single family residence, including other purposes accessory to their use as residences, by the owner or tenant, such as offices for doctors, engineers, architects, lawyers, or others where the number of persons employed on the premises, besides the owner, shall not be more than two.”
The first question transferred…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Village of Riverside v. KuhneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
- Jones v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Seaman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HollistonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- McGuire v. PurcellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tylle v. ZouchaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Tasker v. New Hampshire Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Hancock v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Dlugos v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- State v. FerrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.