Legal Opinion

Donald Frohmader v. Deputy D. Wayne

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1992No. 91-1249PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Donald Frohmader brought this action against Defendant Deputy D. Wayne alleging federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force and inadequate medical attention and pendent state law claims for assault, battery, outrageous conduct, and negligence. The district court, rejecting the recommendation of a magistrate judge, granted summary judgment in favor of Wayne on the federal claims and dismissed the pendent claims without prejudice. Frohmader v. Wayne, 766 F.Supp. 909, 913-17 (D.Colo.1991). The district court concluded that Frohmader’s evidence failed to establish a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Groman v. Township Of ManalapanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Hinton v. City Of ElwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Mia Fontana v. D.E. HaskinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. James P. Crocker v. Deputy Sheriff Steven Eric BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  5. O'Shea v. Yellow Technology Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API