Legal Opinion
Aaron v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 21, 2002No. 00-315CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for overtime pay. Plaintiffs are employees or former employees of the Bureau of Prisons (“Bureau”) or Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (“FPI”) (referred to hereafter as “UNICOR”). Pending is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Al Claims Related to UNICOR. Oral argument was held on January 18, 2002. On January 31, 2002, the court ordered supplemental briefing concerning the consistency of defendant’s position with certain items of legislative history concerning the Bureau and UNICOR. For the reasons set out below, defendant’s motion is granted.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Galvan, Gilbert W. v. Fed Pris Indust IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Angel M. Cosme Nieves v. Col. Robert C. Deshler, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Core Concepts of Florida, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Ains, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Acebal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Aaron v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.