Legal Opinion
Young v. Mahoning County, Ohio
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 2005No. 4:01CV1296, 4:01CV1508PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ECONOMUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judg ment. See (Case No. 4:01CV1296, Dkt. # 55; Case No. 4.-01CV1508, Dkt. # 38) 1
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. The Mahoning County Sheriff, Randall Wellington (the “Sheriff’), appointed the plaintiffs, Tawan-na Young (‘Young”) and Melissa Desavig-ny (“Desavigny”), to the position of deputy sheriffs on May 25, 2000. See (Dkt. # 56, Aff. of Theresa Sedzmak (“Sedzmak Aff.”) ¶ 3, Exs. 2 & 3). The plaintiffs’ appointment letters…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meyers v. City of Columbus, 07ap-958 (7-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008