Legal Opinion

Carey v. Bewley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 1, 1924No. 11283PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This aptdon w-as filed by the plaintiffs in error to recover certain land which was allotted in the name of Lewis Cochran, a duly enrolled Cherokee Indian. The cause was called for trial and, after the attorneys for the plaintiffs had made the opening statement, upon the motion of the defendants, judgment was rendered for the defendants upon the pleadings and the opening statement by the plaintiffs. From this judgment the plaintiffs have appealed.

‘The action of the trial court in rendering judgment is attacked on the ground that the petition' of the plaintiffs and the unequivocal admissions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maharry v. EatmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. McKeever v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Henley v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Hope v. FoleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Snell v. CanardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Souerdike v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Crowe v. WarnarkeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Haddock v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Crowe v. WarnarkeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Eliza, Seminole No. 84 v. LackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API