Legal Opinion

United States v. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1957No. 4881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Judge

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, C. D. 1773, sustaining the importer’s protest as to merchandise described as onion powder and garlic powder, and holding such merchandise to be properly classifiable as spices under paragraph 781 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and the President’s proclamation of May 4, 1948, T. D. 51909. The merchandise had been classified by the collector as vegetables cut, sliced, or otherwise reduced in size, or reduced to flour, or prepared or preserved…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. WallaceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  5. Schoenfeld & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bestfoods v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API