Schoenfeld & Sons v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Eicwall, Judge:
These are protests, consolidated at the trial, against the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise described as dehydrated kibbled onions and dehydrated garlic powder at 17% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and the President’s proclamation of May 4, 1948, T. D. 51909, as vegetables, prepared or preserved, or as vegetables, reduced to flour, respectively. It is claimed that both types of merchandise are properly dutiable at 12)4 per centum ad valorem under paragraph…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Charles T. Wilson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- United States v. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957