Legal Opinion

Schoenfeld & Sons v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 15, 1952No. C. D. 1464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eicwall, Judge:

These are protests, consolidated at the trial, against the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise described as dehydrated kibbled onions and dehydrated garlic powder at 17% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and the President’s proclamation of May 4, 1948, T. D. 51909, as vegetables, prepared or preserved, or as vegetables, reduced to flour, respectively. It is claimed that both types of merchandise are properly dutiable at 12)4 per centum ad valorem under paragraph…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Charles T. Wilson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. United States v. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API