Legal Opinion

State v. Dean

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1958No. 5983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from an order of the Presiding Judge of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining defendant-appellee’s motions for new trial. We hereinafter refer to defendant-appellee, Homer Jack Dean, as Dean. The motions for new trial were originally filed after Dean’s conviction by the verdict of a jury of murder in the first degree. His sentence and judgment had theretofore been reviewed on appeal and affirmed.

The error assigned is that the court abused its discretion in sustaining the motions and granting a new trial to Dean.

The brief in favor of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Echtle v. CardWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Advance Veneer & Lumber Co. v. HornadayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Foglio v. Alvis, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HuntsmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. City of Toledo v. CrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. City of Toledo v. CrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Johns v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API