Legal Opinion

Advance Veneer & Lumber Co. v. Hornaday

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1911No. 7,347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by Charles P. Hornaday against the Advance Veneer and Lumber Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellee, by a contract in writing dated April 25, 1906, sold to appellant “the timber of every kind, size and character” within a certain boundary on his land in Hendricks county. It was stipulated that appellant was to remove all said timber by August 1, 1906, and for that purpose it was at all times to have ingress to and egress from said land. It was further agreed that appellant was to pile all brush and limbs left from said timber, “such piling of brush and limbs to render the burning thereof easily accomplished.” vThe underbrush was not to be cut or piled.

Appellee alleged that he fully…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Owens v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Rooker v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Magnuson v. BillingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Federal Cement Tile Co. v. KorffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Bereolos v. RothIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. DeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Nestler v. Pure Silk Hosiery MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API