Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 11574PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, J., pro tem.

A petition for hearing of the appeal herein, after a decision thereon by division one of the first appellate district of the district court of appeal, was granted by this court. Further consideration of the questions presented by the appellants and the petitioners has led to the conclusion that that part of the opinion of the district court of appeal as prepared by Mr. Justice St. Sure of that court (hereinafter quoted) correctly expresses, in all essential particulars, the views of this court with reference thereto. It is as follows:

“Petitioner obtained writs of mandate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. French v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Sheehan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Lemley v. Doak Gas Engine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Sheehan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Parrish v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Pasadena Unified School District v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API