Charles Oliver Williamson v. United States

Appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his sentence for violations of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2312 and 2313, as ambiguous and void because it was to run consecutively to a prior sentence for a conviction allegedly pending appeal and, therefore, not yet finalized. If the sentence is not void, appellant further contends that it must run consecutively only to Count One of that prior conviction, and not to the aggregate eight-year term, imposed on all counts of that conviction. We affirm the district court’s denial of the petition and subsequent motions to set aside…