Legal Opinion

Danny R. Scarponi v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1963No. 7167_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an Order of the District Court summarily denying petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, for the correction of a sentence, based •on his contention that it should be construed, by its terms, to run concurrently with the sentence he is now serving. We .granted leave to appeal in forma pauper-is, ordered the record certified here, and appointed counsel who filed brief and argued the case on behalf of the petitioner. The case is submitted to us on these facts: Petitioner was sentenced by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. James W. AlversonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. David L. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Patrick Henry EarleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Bellam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Edward A. Pugliese v. United States of America, Onofrio Mandracchia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API