Danny R. Scarponi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an Order of the District Court summarily denying petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, for the correction of a sentence, based •on his contention that it should be construed, by its terms, to run concurrently with the sentence he is now serving. We .granted leave to appeal in forma pauper-is, ordered the record certified here, and appointed counsel who filed brief and argued the case on behalf of the petitioner. The case is submitted to us on these facts: Petitioner was sentenced by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. James W. AlversonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. David L. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Patrick Henry EarleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Bellam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Edward A. Pugliese v. United States of America, Onofrio Mandracchia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.