Robert Salley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Concurrence
JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge,
concurring in the result:
I concur in the result and write separately to express my respectful disagreement with the view that a sentencing judge has authority to impose a sentence to run consecutively to a sentence that has not yet been imposed.
Imposition of a consecutive sentence is strong medicine. See United States v. Golomb, 754 F.2d 86 (2d Cir.1985). It may well be warranted in some cases. But it should be used only after awareness of a sentence already imposed so that the punitive effect of the consecutive sentence is carefully considered at the time of its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Benzion GolombCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Gerald Lee EastmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rudolph James Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Farley v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.