Quartaroli v. City of Sonoma
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. Thos. Denny, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiffs bring the action to recover the possession of certain personal property or the value thereof, in case delivery cannot be had, alleged to be $3,590.85. They claim ownership by virtue of a bill of sale from one John T. MacQuiddy, of date September 13,1906. MacQuiddy had entered into a written contract with defendant, the city of Sonoma, to construct a municipal building for that city, agreeing to furnish all materials and labor therefor at the agreed price of $15,475. This contract was duly authorized and legally entered into and was duly recorded. No question arises as to full…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. MatuszewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Hoffman-Marks Co. v. SpiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Union Sheet Metal Works v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.