Legal Opinion

People v. Kacer

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert M. Haft, J.

Defendant stands indicted of the crime of attempted grand larceny in the second degree by extortion (for threatening to harm the business of the complainant) (Penal Law, § 155.05, subd 2, par [e], cl [ix]) and of commercial bribe receiving in the first degree (for soliciting a bribe from the complainant) (Penal Law, § 180.08). He moves to dismiss the indictment claiming that as a matter of law an indictment for attempted extortion and commercial bribe receiving cannot be based on the same facts; and that the evidence before the Grand Jury was insufficient…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. People v. WerblowNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. People v. DaghitaNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. People v. DioguardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brizell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  2. National Electrical Benefit Fund v. Heary Brothers Lightning Protection Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  3. Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. CattellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  4. People v. CapparelliNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. PodolskyNew York Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API