Legal Opinion

People v. Daghita

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1950PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

The defendant stands convicted, upon two separate counts, of two separate crimes, the crime of grand larceny in the first degree (Penal Law, §§ 1290, 1294) and the crime of criminally concealing and withholding stolen property (Penal Law, § 1308). There can be no doubt on the record before us that the jury was fully justified in finding defendant guilty of a single continuing grand larceny: the evidence was more than sufficient to establish that he had stolen a considerable quantity of merchandise over a period of time from Montgomery Ward’s Ithaca store and that he had used a large portion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. People v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. People v. . SpivakNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. People v. MarinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. People v. VitoloNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. People v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Mike Milanovich and Virginia Milanovich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  4. People v. TatumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API