Legal Opinion
Siegman v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 15, 1946No. 409PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Appellant, a licensed street photographer, was charged with a violation of Section 3 of Article XXXI of the Police Regulations of the District of Columbia. The regulation provides:
“No person licensed under this Article, while engaged in taking photographs shall impede traffic as defined in the District ef Columbia Traffic Acts, nor shall he remain longer than five minutes at any one location on the streets, sidewalks or other public spaces.”
*765The information charged that defendant had remained “longer than five minutes in a certain location” on F Street, Northwest.
Appellant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. WurzbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Washington Mobilization Committee v. Maurice J. Cullinane, Chief of the Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. CoppesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Fields v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- ANTOINETTE BOLZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.