Legal Opinion
Richard P. Kuntz v. Nat J. Reese
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1985No. 83-2151PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This case presents four important questions regarding the scope and application of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1381 (1982).1 Plaintiffs-appellants, who are retired former employees of defendants-appellees, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and sought recovery for their employers’ alleged violations of ERISA and various California laws. The district court dismissed each claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. For the reasons…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- The Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust, Cross-Appellant v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc. And Walter N. Corrigan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Donald F. Bogue v. Ampex Corporation and Allied-Signal, Inc. Does 1-10, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Richard P. Kuntz v. Nat J. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- The Sommers Drug Stores Company Employee Profit Sharing Trust, Cross-Appellee v. Walter N. Corrigan and Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.