Legal Opinion
Fresh Meadows Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 1976PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 8 and June 10, 1976, respectively, affirmed for the reasons stated by Nadel, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Birns, Capozzoli, Lane and Lynch, JJ.; Murphy, J. P., dissents in the following memorandum: Murphy, J. P. (dissenting). The instant proceeding involves another example of the type of unrealistic administrative determination which causes potential investors and legitimate builders to refrain from doing business in or with New York City. (Cf. Matter of 54/55 Sixth Realty Corp. v…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Chatlos v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Fresh Meadows Associates v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- 54/55 Sixth Realty Corp. v. LeventhalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Taleff Realty Corp. v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by41 opinions
- Mid-State Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Tockwotten Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ista Management v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Oriental Boulevard Co. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Plaza Realty Investors v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.