Legal Opinion
Fresh Meadows Associates v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1976PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard Nadel, J.
This is an article 78 proceeding wherein the petitioner seeks an order annulling or modifying a determination by the Conciliation and Appeals Board.
The petitioner is the owner of an apartment complex which is subject to the Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of New York, §§ YY51-10 — YY51-7.0) and code promulgated pursuant thereto. The dispute herein concerns the installation of air-conditioning units by the tenants and the additional charges to tenants for such installation. Underlying this dispute is the recent energy situation which has brought about sharp increases in the…
2Cited by37 opinions
- Fresh Meadows Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Mid-State Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Tockwotten Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ista Management v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Plaza Realty Investors v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.