Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Briggs

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 26, 1952No. File. 84332PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCullinan, J.

The plaintiffs seek to foreclose a judgment lien on two parcels of real estate in Redding. They allege that, although their judgment lien was not recorded until April 18, 1951, it, nonetheless, has priority as a lien against the first parcel, which piece alone is the subject of controversy, from March 23, 1948, by virtue of its relation back to an attachment made on that date. In addition to the owner of the equity of redemption, the plaintiffs have joined as defendants three parties who claim an interest in the first parcel. Two defendants, Harold B. Senior Lumber Company and Gulf Oil…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Butchers' Ice & Supply Co. v. BascomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. State v. HartleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  4. Ahern v. PurnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  5. Joseph v. DonovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beers v. Westport Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API