Legal Opinion
Beers v. Westport Bank & Trust Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 6, 1998No. AC 17097PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court quieting title to certain real property in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly concluded that the defendant’s prejudgment attachment was invalid because the certificate of attachment incorrectly recited that the Superior Court in the judicial district of Danbury, rather than the Superior Court in the judicial district of Fairfield at Bridgeport, had issued the prejudgment remedy. We reverse the trial court’s judgment because we conclude that the prejudgment attachment was valid.1
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- CMG Realty of Connecticut, Inc. v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chemical Bank v. CoanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Beers v. Westport Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Randolph Fndn. v. Appeal Fr. Prob., No. X05 Cv 98-0167903 S (Apr. 3, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001