Legal Opinion

Waite v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1957No. 9444PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered in favor,, of defendant after its general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff elected not to amend the complaint.

Hence the sole question is whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It contains two causes of action. It is based upon an indemnity bond issued by defendant calculated to indemnify plaintiff against loss as a result of fraud or dishonesty of plaintiff’s employees and “commission station agents.”

The provision of the bond relied on by plaintiff here…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Emery v. EmeryMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Marcellus v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Maryland Casualty Company v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Christensen v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API