Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ballenger v. Tillman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1958No. 9645Published

1Dissent

DEAN KING, District Judge:

I am dissenting in this case, not because I think an injustice has been done, but because I think it establishes a legal precedent which if followed will have a very adverse effect upon judicial proceedings in Montana designed to settle disputes and secure justice as between litigants. Our code system of pleading was adopted as an improvement on the old common-law system in which the pleadings were largely formal and largely legal conclusions. The complaint in this action is similar to but not sufficient as a common-law complaint.

I believe that the more fully the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tillson v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Chealey v. PurdyMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Connelly Co. v. Schlueter Bros.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Courtney v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Farwell v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API