Legal Opinion
Dare v. Byram
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the lav/ and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of plaintiffs’ motion seeking to compel defen*991dant Phillip C. Mahoney, M.D. to attend a further deposition to answer questions regarding certain acute care issues related to his treatment of David A. Dare (plaintiff). The questions regarding those acute care issues are related to Mahoney’s examination, diagnosis and treatment of plaintiff and “for the purpose of establishing the generally accepted medical practice in the community”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Carvalho v. New Rochelle HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Forgays v. MerolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bubar v. BrodmanNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- Clack v. SayeghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- CLACK, JULIE v. SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITALAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Clack v. SayeghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Lieblich v. Saint Peter's Hospital of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.