Legal Opinion
Bubar v. Brodman
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.
This action seeks recovery of damages for negligence/medical malpractice allegedly committed by defendants in the course of their care and treatment of Raymond Buhar (plaintiff). The named defendants include Dr. Brodman, a heart surgeon who performed a triple coronary artery bypass and aortic valve replacement procedure upon plaintiff on October 1, 2003. The complaint and bill of particulars focus on the surgery and its aftermath. After Dr. Brodman initially closed up plaintiff following the bypass and valve replacement, plaintiff experienced…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Johnson v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Rogotzki v. ScheptNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Gilly v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Carvalho v. New Rochelle HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hildebrandt v. StephanNew York Supreme Court · 2013