Legal Opinion

United States v. Lowe

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 9, 1996No. Criminal 95-10404-PBSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

Defendant Paul E. Lowe (“Lowe”) moves to dismiss Count One of the Indictment charging him with carjacking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119 1 on the grounds that the statute exceeds the scope of Congress’ regulatory power under the Commerce Clause. For the reasons given below, Lowe’s motion is DENIED.

In United States v. Lopez, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), the Supreme Court struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which made possession of a firearm in a school zone a federal crime, as beyond the power of Congress to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. Kevin Bishop, United States of America v. Edward StokesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Donovan Dwayne Oliver Darryl Lee McMillan Nathaniel JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Diaz-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldbergDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  2. United States v. Villalobos-MaciasDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  3. United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API