Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Michigan United Railways Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1911No. Docket No. 22PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Case by Jennie Rouse, administratrix of the estate of Albert Rouse, deceased, against the Michigan United Railways Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff; defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

Albert Rouse sued the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries. A judgment in his favor was reversed. Rouse v. Railways Co., 158 *477Mich. 109 (122 N. W. 532). While the cause was pending in this court, on May 19, 1909, Albert Rouse died intestate. His death was not a result of the injuries inflicted by defendant. His widow, Jennie Rouse, was appointed administratrix of his estate, a suggestion of the death of the plaintiff was made, and an order entered reviving the suit. The cause was again tried, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

Accompanying the bill of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rouse v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. In Re Olney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hindmarsh v. Sulpho Saline Bath Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Coulson v. Shirks Motor Express CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
  5. Powers v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API