Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Michigan United Railways Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1909No. Docket No. 5PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Case by Albert Rouse against the Michigan United Railways Company for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff was injured while crossing the street railway track of defendant in the city of Lansing in March, 1907. He claims that this occurred on account of the negligence of the servants of defendant. He was a farmer, and came into North Lansing on the forenoon of the day of the accident, where he stopped for some time, and then proceeded west on Franklin street, turning south *110when he reached Washington avenue, driving on the east side of defendant’s tracks, which are laid in the middle of that avenue. He was driving a team of horses hitched to a wide-tired wagon, with a rack bos 16 feet in…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Powers v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Rouse v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, and Third-Party v. L. A. Barnaby and Howard Parker, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Vought v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Butler v. RockettMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API