Legal Opinion

In Re Olney's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1944No. Docket No. 43, Calendar No. 42,522PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

I concur with Mr. Justice Sharpe in affirming the judgment in favor of Edwin E. Ben-nett, but I am not in accord with my Brother’s holding that there can be no recovery in the suit brought by Edwin E. Bennett as administrator of the estate of Margaret B. Bennett, deceased.

Act No. 297, Pub. Acts 1939 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 14061 et seq., Stat. Ann. 1943 Cum. Supp. § 27.711 et seq.), does not repeal, but instead only amends, our so-called death act. 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14061 et seq. (Stat. Ann. § 27.711 et seq.). Nor does the 1939 act repeal our so-called survival statute (3 Comp. Laws…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Ford v. Maney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re Chamberlain's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Martinelli v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Gorton v. HarmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bricker v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. O'NEILL v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Tkachik v. MandevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hawkins v. Regional Medical Laboratories, PCMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API