Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Anschutz Drilling Company, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1962No. 9587PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiffs sued to establish and enforce a contract by which the defendants were to sell them certain oil leases. After the presentation of the plaintiffs’ evidence, the trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, from which plaintiffs appeal. Under those circumstances, we consider the evidence and every reasonable inference that may be derived therefrom in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs’ theory of their case, which we do in our synopsis of the facts. 1

The plaintiffs are engaged in the business of exploring for gas and oil and of buying and selling of such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schaeffer v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Hoyt v. Wasatch Homes, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Scoville v. Kellogg Sales Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Util. L. Rep. P 13,913 Lone Mountain Production Company v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Lone Mountain Production Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989
  3. Mildon v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Becker v. Hsa/Wexford Bancgroup, L.L.C.District Court, D. Utah · 2001
  5. Mildon v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API