Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Beaumont Heritage Society

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided September 18, 2009No. 09-09-00371-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.

This is an accelerated interlocutory appeal from a temporary injunction order that enjoins appellants 1 from demolishing South Park Middle School. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (Vernon 2008).

In ruling on a temporary injunction, the trial court does not make a final decision on disputed facts; instead, the purpose of a temporary injunction “is to preserve the status quo of the litigation’s subject matter pending a trial on the merits.” Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 204 (Tex.2002). Therefore, in deciding whether to grant or deny an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Brooks v. Expo Chemical Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. NMTC CORP. v. Conarroe, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. U.S. Denro Steels, Inc. v. Lieck, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  2. Crosstex NGL Pipeline, L.P. v. Reins Road Farms-1, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013
  3. Thomas v. Beaumont Heritage Society, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2011
  4. Chad Dickerson v. Acadian Cypress & Hardwoods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
  5. Chad R. Dubois, Kenneth D. Simmons III, Monica Bentzen, and Lance T. Mendoza v. Anesthesia Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API