Legal Opinion
NMTC CORP. v. Conarroe
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided February 27, 2003No. 09-02-499 CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID B. GAULTNEY, Justice.
NMTC Corp. d/b/a Mateo Tools (“Mat-eo”) sued Jule Conarroe for breach of a contract containing a covenant not to compete. Mateo also sought a temporary injunction pending a trial on the merits. The trial court denied the temporary injunction request, and Mateo filed this interlocutory appeal.
BACKGROUND
Conarroe sold Mateo Tools. As a Mateo distributor, Conarroe had a specified territory and a list of potential customers. The distributor contract contained the following nonsolicitation or covenant not to compete clause:
For a period of one year after the Term of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Light v. Centel Cellular Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Cardinal Health Staffing Network, Inc. v. Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Wright v. Sport Supply Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
- Thomas v. Beaumont Heritage Society, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
- Primary Health Physicians v. Sarver, Wallace, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
- Argo Group US, Inc. v. LevinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.