Legal Opinion

Sharon v. Sharon

California Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1890No. 12776PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Tevis and Baldwin were the sureties on the undertaking given on the appeal from the judgment originally entered in this cause (75 Cal. 1); and when, on the fifth day of May, 1888, the plaintiff moved the court below for judgment against the present defendant, executor of the will of the original defendant, for alimony and costs, she also moved that the judgment be entered up as a judgment against the sureties, as well as against said defendant, and in entering the judgment it was so done. From the judgment so entered against them, the sureties appeal.

So long as the plaintiff was not entitled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Parnell v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burnham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Stafford v. YergeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API