Crescent v. White

OPINION

At pre-trial conference, the district court dismissed plaintiff’s action, which seeks to have a deed from defendant husband to defendant wife declared void under the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act, NRS 112.010 et seq. The court evidently believed recording the deed constituted constructive notice to creditors, as well as to “subsequent purchasers and mortgagees,” NRS 111.320, thus conclusively establishing an affirmative defense based on the statute of limitations, NRS 11.190 (3) (d). 1

“It is not our understanding, however, that the statute gives notice to all persons in all…