Legal Opinion

In Re Wilson's Estate

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1936No. 3121PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

OPINION

1. In our former opinion nothing was said concerning the competency of respondent as a witness. In appellant's petition for rehearing it is asserted that, because Mrs. Wilson was dead, respondent was not a competent witness, because of the provisions of section 8966 N.C.L. At the hearing in the district court, appellant found herself in a position where she must either have a material portion of her testimony stricken under the provisions of said section, or withdraw her objection to respondent's competency. She chose to have her own testimony remain, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
  2. Edmonds v. PerryNevada Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Craig v. LaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Crescent v. WhiteNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Sturgill v. Industrial Painting Corporation of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API